April 30, 2008
via EDGAR and Facsimile |
Mr. James Rosenberg |
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
Re: American Financial Group, Inc. |
Form 10-K for December 31, 2007 |
Filed on February 28, 2008 |
File No. 001-13653 |
Dear Mr. Rosenberg: |
AFG is responding to the Staff's comments in your letter dated April 16, 2008, regarding the above-referenced filing. Comments in the Staff's letter are reproduced below and are followed by AFG's responses.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies
Investments, page 27
Although the determination of "fair value" is not one of the critical accounting policies outlined on page 24 of AFG's 2007 Form 10-K, we acknowledge the importance of fair value measurements in financial reporting. The intent of the disclosure you reference, as well as other MD&A investment disclosures, is to provide a management perspective on the nature of, and
Mr. James Rosenberg |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Page 2 |
exposures in, our portfolio. As required, we will adopt SFAS No. 157 in our first quarter 2008 Form 10-Q; disclosures enabling investors to understand how we establish fair values for our investments will be included. Our Form 10-Q disclosures will also reflect our consideration of the disclosure issues set forth in the Staff's March 2008 "sample letter" to certain public companies on the topic of fair value measurement.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to consolidated Financial Statements
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, page F-26
We utilize a number of pricing services in determining the fair value of our investment portfolio. The pricing services do not issue a report to us nor is the information we utilize quoted or summarized in our filings. In addition, the information in our reports is not reviewed or passed upon by the pricing services. Accordingly, we do not believe Rule 436 of the Securities Act requires the information requested by the Staff.
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk, page F-27
Mr. James Rosenberg |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Page 3 |
AFG is the investment manager for six CDOs. It also has investments ranging from 7.5% to 24.4% of the most subordinate tranche of these entities. Owners of these tranches receive distributions from the residual income of the CDO after the more senior tranches are paid stated rates of interest. In analyzing all expected cash flows (the income from our subordinate tranche investment and our expected management fees), AFG has determined that it will not receive a majority of their residual returns nor absorb a majority of these entities' expected losses. Accordingly, AFG is not the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities under paragraph 14 of FIN 46(R). In addition, there are no contractual arrangements for AFG to provide additional funding for, or purchase securities from, these entities or their investors. Absent a voluntary election to purchase additional interests in one of these entities, there is no scenario in which AFG would have to consolidate any of the CDOs. Acco rdingly, AFG's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these entities is its aggregate carrying value ($20 million at December 31, 2007).
The disclosures of off-balance sheet arrangements called for by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K are required if such arrangements are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the registrant's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, etc. that is material to investors. Given that our maximum exposure to loss if all of our CDOs failed to provide any return is less than one-half of one percent of AFG's equity, we do not believe the disclosures requested by the Staff in comments No. 3 and No. 4 are material to investors. Nonetheless, since Instruction No. 5 to Item 303(a)(4) states that the discussion of off-balance sheet arrangements need not repeat information provided in the footnotes to the financial statements provided the footnote information is clearly cross-referenced, we propose expanding (in our 2008 Form 10-K) the footnote disclosure of our CDO investments on page F-27 to clarify our maximum exposure with language similar to the following:
Collateralized Debt Obligations AFG is the investment manager and has investments ranging from 7.5% to 24.4% of the most subordinate tranche of six collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs"). Upon formation between 2004 and 2007, these entities issued securities in various senior and subordinate classes and invested the proceeds primarily in secured bank loans, which serve as collateral for the securities issued by each particular CDO. None of the collateral was purchased from AFG. AFG's investments in these entities are credited with residual income of the CDO only after the CDOs pay operating expenses (including management fees), stated rates of interest on, and returns
Mr. James Rosenberg |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Page 4 |
of capital to, senior levels of securities. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of investments managed by these entities was approximately $2.4 billion.
AFG is not required to consolidate these variable interest entities because it is not the primary beneficiary. There are no contractual requirements or management intentions for AFG to provide additional funding for these entities. Accordingly, AFG's maximum exposure to loss is its aggregate carrying value ($20 million at December 31, 2007, included in fixed maturities).
4. Also, revise your MD&A disclosures to address:
We propose adding disclosure similar to the following in our 2008 Form 10-K under the MD&A heading "Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements" in addition to the expanded footnote disclosure discussed in response to comment No. 3 to address (i) the likelihood of consolidation, (ii) what events would require us to reconsider whether we are the primary beneficiary, and (iii) reasonable expectations for a material impact on income.
As discussed under "Collateralized Debt Obligations" in Note N to the Financial Statements, AFG owns interests in certain variable interest entities which are not required to be consolidated. Given that there are no contractual requirements or intentions to make additional investments in these entities (which would be "reconsideration events" requiring analysis to determine if AFG would be the primary beneficiary of the CDO), management considers the likelihood of consolidating these entities in the future to be remote.
5. Please revise your notes to financial statements to provide the disclosures required by paragraph 24 of FIN 46R or tell us why such disclosures are not required.
The disclosures contained in Note N on page F-27 were intended to meet those required by paragraph 24 of FIN 46R. As noted in our response to comment No. 3, the disclosures will be further clarified in our 2008 Form 10-K.
We acknowledge that (i) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in our filings with the Commission; (ii) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not prevent the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and (iii) the Commission has taken the position that the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
Mr. James Rosenberg |
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Page 5 |
If you have any questions or comments regarding the information set forth above, please feel free to contact me at (513) 579-6633 (FAX: (513) 369-5750).
American Financial Group, Inc. |
|
BY: s/Keith A. Jensen |
|
Keith A. Jensen |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
cc: Ms. Mary Mast |
|
Ms. Ibolya Ignat |